Tag Archive | "National Automobile Dealers Association"

Lawmaker, NADA to GMAC: Floorplanning at Crossroads

WASHINGTON — U.S. Congresswoman Candice Miller (R-Mich.) and National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) chairman John McEleney have undertaken separate campaigns to extend a program designed to provide floorplanning credit to Chrysler dealerships.

Up to 140 dealerships will be adversely affected when the initial six-month term ends on Nov. 15. The program began after GMAC became Chrysler’s captive lender in the wake of the OEM’s May bankruptcy filing. The facilitation of interim floorplan financing was part of an agreement between the two companies, the Obama administration and Chrysler Financial, which will cease operations in 2011.

Miller has been working to gather more signatures for her letter, which will be mailed to GMAC and Chrysler Financial as early as today.

NADA’s McEleney wrote to Chrysler Group CEO Sergio Marchionne, warning that the automaker is at risk of losing “a substantial portion of its retail network” — namely, those dealerships that were turned down for floorplanning by GMAC or don’t expect to be approved by the Nov. 15 deadline.

McEleney urged Marchionne to broker an intercreditor agreement between the two lenders and extend the program by 12 months. The full text of his letter can be found at NADA.org.

Posted in Auto Industry NewsComments (0)

NADA Chief Economist Counters Edmunds.com Analysis of Clunkers Program

McLEAN, Va. — After a thorough review of the Cash for Clunkers program, the chief economist of the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA), Paul Taylor, determined that the cost of each incremental vehicle sold was around $4,587. An incremental sale is a sale that would not otherwise have occurred without the Clunkers program.

His findings bring into serious question the methodology behind the $24,000 estimate promoted last week by the car-buying Website Edmunds.com.

“It’s really not that hard to determine a credible cost estimate for the Clunkers program,” says Taylor. “You subtract projected sales versus actual sales for July and August when the Clunkers program was operating, and divide the program’s $3 billion by that number.”

Taylor says that, based on sales volume for previous months, a realistic projection of auto sales for July and August would be around 1.6 million. Actual sales for those two months totaled 2,253,963. The difference is 653,963. That’s the number of incremental sales generated by the Clunkers program. Divide the program’s $3 billion by that number and you get $4,587, the average cost per incremental Clunker sale.

“The analysis by Edmunds.com is wrong on the two main points that it tries to make,” Taylor said. “First, because of its flawed methodology, the study can’t form the basis for measuring the program’s impact or costs. Secondly, and more importantly, the analysis clouds understanding and misleads rather than clarifies the true state of auto sales and the economy.”

Edmunds.com says it came up with its estimates by examining the sales trend for luxury vehicles and others not in Cash for Clunkers, and applying the historic relationship of those vehicles to total SAAR (Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate). Taylor says this method virtually assured that cost estimates would be “overstated and inflated.”

“Historically, over the past 20 years, auto sales have been lower in July and August than in June, in the absence of strong incentives. Edmunds ignores this,” Taylor said.

“The Dow Jones and broader market indexes made strong recoveries over the summer, assisting luxury light vehicle sales. But there is a fundamental difference between what drives luxury car sales and non-luxury sales,” Taylor added. “An improving stock market, for example, may boost luxury car sales but it has little effect on non-luxury sales. Job growth, income growth and housing affect non-luxury vehicle sales. And in each of those categories the numbers are not good. Unemployment is up. Income is down. And housing prices continued to fall through July. This has not been the kind of economic environment that encourages a purchase by the average car buyer.”

Posted in Auto Industry NewsComments (0)

NADA Study: Fewer Dealers Would Recommend Their DSP Vendor

McLEAN, Va. – Dealership satisfaction with Dealer System Provider (DSP) vendors declined significantly from the 2007 survey, according to new research from the National Automobile Dealers Association’s Information Technology Committee. DSP vendors develop and support dealership computer systems that assist dealers in managing their operations.

The 2009 survey shows that only 72 percent of dealership personnel are satisfied overall with their DSP vendors versus 79 percent in 2007. Fifty-three percent of dealership personnel in 2009 would recommend their DSP vendor to another dealership, slightly less than the 55 percent who said they would recommend their DSP vendor in 2007.

“Even though the overall satisfaction of the DSP vendors decreased from the 2007 survey, some vendors did show improvement,” said Jim Waldron, owner of Jim Waldron Buick-Pontiac-GMC Truck in Davison, Mich., and chairman of NADA’s IT committee.

“The vendors indicated they had planned to address topics in the 2007 survey that received low satisfaction ratings, but the overall results show that as a group they were not successful in improving overall dealership satisfaction, system functionality, customer service or training,” Waldron added. “We hope they will work diligently in coming months to improve their products and services for dealers.”

The survey shows that dealership satisfaction with DSP vendors is driven mainly by:

  • System Functionality – Key functionality drivers include flexibility of system software to adapt to dealerships’ business needs and the ability to customize the software for dealership needs.
  • Customer Service – Key service drivers include satisfaction with overall customer service and the speed of getting changes and modifications made.
  • Third Party Vendors – Key integration driver includes satisfaction with the ability of the system to allow third party vendors to share information.
  • Training – A key training driver includes effectiveness of technical training.

“The survey highlights areas that are important to dealers and where there are opportunities for the DSP vendors to improve,” said Dick Malaise, NADA vice president and chief information officer.

The survey was conducted for NADA by the automotive marketing research firm Friedman-Swift Associates in Cincinnati, Ohio. Friedman-Swift Associates conducted phone interviews with 984 dealership personnel including dealers and general managers, sales managers, service managers, parts managers and office managers and controllers.

Posted in Auto Industry NewsComments (0)