Tag Archive | "Consumer Financial Protection Bureau"

CFPB: Longer-Term Loans Not Having Desired Effect for Borrowers, Finance Sources


WASHINGTON, D.C. — At F&I Think Tank 2017, held in Dallas on Sept. 14, F&I trainer Tony Dupaquier of The Academy revealed that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) was actively monitoring the auto finance industry, performing audits to ensure finance sources are adhering to buying guidelines it’s helping to shape.

The revelation was based on interviews with representatives from four primary finance sources, two factory finance companies, and one secondary finance company. And according to those conversations, Dupaquier shared, what the regulator is concerned about is financial stress of the consumer.

On Tuesday, the CFPB released “Growth in Longer-Term Auto Loans,” and eight-page report that seemed to back the claims of Dupaquier’s anonymous sources. The bureau, however, noted that the report is part of a series of quarter reports of consumer credit trends using a “longitudinal, nationally-representative sample of approximately five million de-identified credit records from one of the three nationwide credit reporting agencies.”

The report centered on loan terms, noting that 42% of auto loans made in the last year carried a payback term of six or more years, compared to 26% in 2009. It also warned that six-year auto loans are riskier, cost more, are often used by consumers with lower credit scores to finance large amounts, and have higher rates of default.

“The move to longer-term auto loans is opening up more risk for consumers,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “These loans are more expensive and can result in consumers continuing to owe even after they are no longer driving their car. Consumers should know before they owe and shop for the best deal based on costs incurred over the life of the loan.”

The report does concede that consumers are simply financing larger amounts, and are electing for longer terms to keep monthly payments affordable. The regulator, however, notes that the availability of longer-term loans may be the reason car buyers are financing more.

According to the bureau’s report, the average original loan amount for a five-year loan was $20,100, compared to $25,300 for a six-year loan. The average finance amount for loans with terms of seven years or more was $32,200. “To the extent that consumers are buying more expensive cars, making smaller down payments, or otherwise financing larger loan amounts, the increased use of these longer-term loans may be a result,” the report states.

The bureau notes in its report that the average amount financed in 2009 was $18,179. By 2016, the average increased by 16%. And because of longer-term loans, the average monthly payment increased only 7% over that same period. However, the report also shows that loans with terms of six years or more had a default rate that exceeded 8%, whereas shorter-term loans have had default rates closer to 4%.

“That means that six-year loans are about twice as likely as five year-loans to result in a default,” the report states, in part. “The greater adoption of these loans may potentially pose greater risks to both consumers and lenders.”

The reason, according to the bureau, is consumers with lower credit scores are typically the ones electing for longer-term loans. The report notes that the average credit score for borrowers who take out six-year loans is 674, which is 39 points below the average for borrowers who take out five-year loans.

“The higher default rates observed for six-year loans should not be interpreted as a causal relationship,” the bureau warns. “Borrowers who expect to struggle making the payments on a loan financed over five years may be more likely to opt for longer-term financing to ease their financial burden each month. Riskier borrowers may thus prefer longer-term loans, which is consistent with our [findings] that borrowers taking out six-year loans tend to have lower credit scores than borrowers with five-year loans.”

Posted in Auto Industry NewsComments (0)

President Trump Orders Review of Dodd-Frank


WASHINGTON, D.C. — President Donald Trump took his first step toward making good on his promise to dismantle the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, signing on Friday an executive order directing the secretary of the Treasury to review the 2010 financial oversight law.

The order directs the Treasury secretary to consult with members of regulatory agencies and the Dodd-Frank-created Financial Stability Oversight Council and report back to the president within 120 days (and periodically thereafter). The report, and all subsequent reports, will identify any laws and regulations that inhibit federal regulation of the U.S. financial system.

“Today we’re signing core principles for regulating the United States financial system,” Trump said after signing the order. “It doesn’t get much bigger than this, right?”

The core principles his order lays out include regulations that “empower Americans to make independent financial decisions”; prevent taxpayer-funded bailouts; foster economic growth; enable American companies to be competitive in domestic and foreign markets; advance American interests in international financial regulatory negotiations; and “restore public accountability within federal financial regulatory framework.”

“The Dodd-Frank Act is a disastrous policy that’s hindering our markets, reducing the availability of credit, and crippling our economy’s ability to grow and create jobs,” said White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer during a press briefing. “Perhaps worst of all, despite all of its overreaching, Dodd-Frank did not address the causes of the financial crisis, something we all know must be done.”

Enacted in response to the Great Recession, the Dodd-Frank Act created new regulations along with several new government enforcement agencies, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). While Trump’s order isn’t expected to have an immediate impact, it does set the stage for Trump to fulfill his campaign promise to repeal and replace the act. The likely replacement bill is the Financial CHOICE Act of 2016, which was introduced last year by Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas). It stands for “Creating Hope and Opportunity for Investors, Consumers and Entrepreneurs.”

“I’m very pleased that President Trump signed this executive action, which closely mirrors provisions that are found in the Financial CHOICE Act to end Wall Street bailouts, end ‘too big to fail,’ and end top-down regulations that make it harder for our economy to grow and for hardworking Americans to achieve financial independence,” said Hensarling. “Dodd-Frank failed to keep its promises, but President Trump is following through on his promise to the American people to dismantle Dodd-Frank. Republicans are eager to work with the president to end and replace the Dodd-Frank mistake …”

Repealing Dodd-Frank, however, doesn’t necessarily mean the CFPB will be eliminated, as it exists independent of the law that created it. However, regulatory insiders say passage of the Financial CHOICE Act could weaken the bureau. A federal appellate court also ruled the bureau’s single-director structure unconstitutional this past October, giving the president the power to remove Director Richard Cordray at will. The CFPB is appealing that decision.

Asked during Friday’s  press briefing if the administration planned to keep Cordray, Spicer said he didn’t have an announcement on the bureau. “That’s an area that we need to work with Congress on,” he said.

Posted in Auto Industry NewsComments Off on President Trump Orders Review of Dodd-Frank

Senate Republicans Introduce CFPB-Restructuring Bill


WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senator Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) reintroduced on Jan. 11 legislation aimed at replacing the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with a five-member bipartisan board. The bill was introduced just as Congressional Democrats and state regulators pledged to defend the bureau against attacks from the Trump administration.

This is the third time Fischer has introduced a CFPB-restructuring bill; the Republican lawmaker having introduced similar legislation during each of the previous two congressional sessions. This time, Fischer introduced her bill — S. 105, or the Consumer Financial Protection Board Act — less than four months after a three- judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled the bureau’s leadership structure unconstitutional and vacated its $109 million fine against mortgage lender PHH Corp.

“For years, the bad decisions made by a single director at the CFPB have kept families locked out of economic opportunity,” Fischer stated in her press release announcing the bill, which sits in the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. “My bill would prevent this misconduct by divesting the authority from one director to a five-member bipartisan board. This much-needed structural adjustment would bring accountability to the bureau and give more Americans a chance to build their own businesses and provide for their families.”

Under S. 105, each board member would be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The president would also appoint one of the five members to serve as chairperson of the board, which would consist of no more than three members from the same political party. Each board member would serve staggered five-year terms.

If passed, the legislation, which lists Senators John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) as cosponsors, would take effect once the Senate confirms three members.

Replacing the single CFPB director with a committee is also part of legislation Republicans in the House of Representatives introduced last September. That bill, also known as the Financial CHOICE Act of 2016, would also repeal and replace the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act, as well as repeal the CFPB’s March 2013 guidance on dealer participation.

Senators Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) threw their support behind CFPB Director Richard Cordray and his agency during a Jan. 17 press call. Rumors have circulated around Washington D.C., that President Donald Trump and his administration plan to fire the director and abandon the legal defense of the agency in its appeal of the federal appellate court’s October 2016 ruling. The Senate Democrats claim Cordray’s firing would go against Trump’s promise to keep Wall Street accountable.

Sen. Brown and Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) then filed on Jan. 23 a motion to intervene in the bureau’s appeal. Seventeen attorneys generals followed suit the same day.

The attorneys general from Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District Columbia are seeking to defend the constitutionality of the bureau. They argue that the federal appellate court’s ruling, if permitted to stand, would undermine the power of state attorneys general to effectively protect consumers against abuse in the consumer finance industry, as well as “significantly lessen the ability of the CFPB to withstand political pressure and act effectively and independently of the president.”

The regulators also argue that it’s critical they intervene in the case because President Trump has expressed strong opposition to the Dodd-Frank reforms that created the CFPB. “The CFPB is the cop on the beat, protecting Main Street from Wall Street misconduct,” said Attorney General George Jepsen, who led the group of regulators in their filing of the motion. “It was structured by Congress to be a powerful and independent agency that would protect consumers from the abuses of Wall Street, banks, and other large financial institutions. That mission is still critical to consumers today. However, the Trump Administration has said it intends to weaken the CFPB.

“That calls into question whether the new administration will adequately defend the CFPB and the American public it protects.”

Posted in Auto Industry NewsComments Off on Senate Republicans Introduce CFPB-Restructuring Bill

Federal Appeals Court Rules CFPB Structure Unconstitutional


WASHINGTON, D.C. — On Tuesday, a federal appeals court ruled that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional. The appellant court’s main issue is the bureau’s single-director structure, which it found to possess “enormous power over American business, American consumers, and the overall U.S. economy.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit stopped short of calling for the CFPB to be shut down in its 2-1 ruling. Instead, it ruled that the president will now have the authority to remove the director of the CFPB at will. Currently, the CFPB director can only be removed by the president for cause.

“To remedy the constitutional flaw, we follow the Supreme Court’s precedents … and simply sever the statute’s unconstitutional for-cause provision from the remainder of the statute,” wrote Judge Brett Kavanaugh in court’s 110-page majority opinion. “With the for-cause provision severed, the President now will have the power to remove the director at will, and to supervise and direct the director. The CFPB therefore will continue to operate and to perform its many duties, but will do so as an executive agency akin to other executive agencies headed by a single person, such as the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury.”

The case came about after the bureau fined mortgage lender PHH Corp. for allegedly accepting kickbacks from mortgage insurers. The lender appealed the fine, which led to Tuesday’s decision. And as part of that ruling, the federal appeals court threw out the bureau’s $109 million fine against PHH Corp.

To read the full story, click here to read a report from The Washington Post.

Posted in Auto Industry NewsComments Off on Federal Appeals Court Rules CFPB Structure Unconstitutional

NADA’s Koblenz to Shed Light on CFPB at Agent Summit


LAS VEGAS — Andrew D. Koblenz of the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) will speak at the upcoming Agent Summit and provide attendees with insights into the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)’s regulation of the auto finance market, organizers announced Monday. The sixth annual event will be held May 9–11, 2016, at the Venetian Palazzo Las Vegas.

“Understanding the trajectory of the CFPB’s activity regarding the auto finance market is critical to understanding the current regulatory environment in which we find ourselves,” Koblenz said. “It’s also a vital part of evaluating those concrete steps that dealers and lenders can and should be taking in the face of this new regulatory reality.”

Koblenz currently serves as executive vice president of legal and regulatory affairs for NADA, and also oversees the organization’s economic and research department. He is a frequent speaker and valued source for a number of industry events and publications.

At September’s Industry Summit, Koblenz presented “Solving the CFPB Problem,” a comprehensive review of actions undertaken by the CFPB, the effects of those actions on the industry and what the future holds for the oft-maligned agency. He is expected to touch on similar themes at Agent Summit.

“Andy never fails to connect with his audience, because he approaches the topic of compliance with hard-won expertise and disarming humor,” said David Gesualdo, show chair and publisher of Agent Entrepreneur and F&I and Showroom magazines. “He understands both the seriousness and absurdity of the CFPB’s efforts. He is the ideal speaker for a key topic at a critical juncture.”

Registration for Agent Summit is now open at the event’s website as well as by phone, fax and email. Attendees who register by April 4 will enjoy a $100 discount. To inquire about sponsorship and exhibition opportunities, contact Eric Gesualdo via email hidden; JavaScript is required or call 727-612-8826.

Posted in Auto Industry News, Summit UpdatesComments (0)

BMO Completes Acquisition of GE’s Transportation Finance Business


CHICAGO — On Monday, BMO Financial Group completed its acquisition of General Electric (GE) Capital Corporation’s transportation finance business, more two months after the company hinted at a reduction of its U.S. indirect auto finance portfolio to fund the purchase.

The newly acquired business unit, which BMO officials said represents North America’s largest financier to the truck and trailer segment, will be renamed BMO Transportation Finance. It will continue to operate under the leadership of Dan Clark and his management team. On closing, the business had net earning assets of about $8.9 million, BMO said.

“The trucking industry is vital to the North American economy, and we intend to grow that business, building on the team’s 40-year track record of providing industry expertise to its customers,” said David Casper, president and CEO of BMO’s subsidiary BMO Harris Bank, which will oversee the new business unit.

BMO Harris Bank stirred suspicions when it informed dealers on Oct. 1 that it was exiting approximately 12 states in order to refocus “its indirect auto business to solely include the bank’s core market states.” The pullback was thought to be the linked to the bank’s April 2014 decision to move to a flat-fee compensation model in response to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s scrutiny of dealer participation policies. Market insiders believed the bank lost dealers as a result of the move.

At the time of the announcement, a spokesman for BMO Harris Bank denied the move to flats resulted in lost business and maintained that the pullback was the result of a strategic decision. That claim was backed by a Sept. 10 conference call in which BMO Financial Group announced to media and investors its intentions to acquire GE’s business unit.

“The transaction will be funded using existing balance sheet liquidity, additional deposits and some wholesale funding,” Tom Flynn, BMO Financial Group CFO, said during the conference call. “In addition, our funding strategy includes a reduction of our U.S. personal and commercial indirect auto lending portfolio over the next few years.”

BMO Harris Bank, which terminated dealer agreements in those 12 noncore state on Oct. 31, continues to serve dealers in Illinois, Wisconsin Indiana, Minnesota, Kansas, Missouri, Arizona, and Florida.

Posted in Auto Industry NewsComments Off on BMO Completes Acquisition of GE’s Transportation Finance Business

Page 1 of 712345...Last »